[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <viq7cjqmt7guulqbuliismflq5gxtfqrxj7vzn2goctlcn5zlt@vaht6usiiedt>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:48:59 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
Cc: akemnade@...nel.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Input: add TWL603x power button
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 02:44:22PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:58:35 -0700
> Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 02:31:59PM +0200, akemnade@...nel.org wrote:
> > > From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
> > >
> > > Like the TWL4030, these PMICs also have a power button feature, so add
> > > a driver for it.
> >
> > Could it be integrated into twl4030-pwrbutton.c? I think the differences
> > can be accounted for via a "chip" structure attached to a compatible...
> >
> So what is different:
> - different register (but same bit)
> - some custom irq stuff for 603x (so if (is_603x) needed)
Right, why do we need to unmask the interrupt by hand for 6030? I'd
expect this handled in the core, when we request the interrupt, not in
the button driver..in the core, when we request the interrupt, not in
the button driver...
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists