[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <96ae7d38-4ce0-fa34-e6f0-6bb6e4ceaa28@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 12:29:01 +0530
From: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424
compatible
Hi,
On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as
>> the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and
>> use IPQ9574 as the fallback.
>
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what
“doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve
manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux)
and it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if
there’s a specific tree or integration point I should be checking against.
Thanks,
Alam.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists