[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a743099-face-4cc1-91ef-098a748604b7@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:42:02 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424
compatible
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:29:01PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> > > IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as
> > > the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and
> > > use IPQ9574 as the fallback.
> > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what
> “doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve
> manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux) and
> it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if there’s a
> specific tree or integration point I should be checking against.
I tried to apply it to the spi tree
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-6.19
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists