linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424 compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51c6871d-a125-4d76-adaf-d69d6628aa87@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 13:01:52 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@...cinc.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] spi: dt-bindings: spi-qpic-snand: Add IPQ5424
 compatible

On 22/10/2025 08:59, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 10/22/2025 12:39 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 04:35:26PM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>>> IPQ5424 contains the QPIC-SPI-NAND flash controller which is the same as
>>> the one found in IPQ9574. So let's document the IPQ5424 compatible and
>>> use IPQ9574 as the fallback.
>>
>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> Thank you for the feedback. I’d appreciate a bit more clarity on what 
> “doesn't apply against current code” refers to in this context. I’ve 
> manually applied the patch against the latest mainline (torvalds/linux) 


You can easily answer this by yourself. Did you send it to Torvalds? No.
You sent it to someone else, so why do you assume someone else manages
Torvalds' tree?

> and it applied cleanly without any conflicts. Please let me know if 
> there’s a specific tree or integration point I should be checking against.


Please read submitting patches - it explains that. It also explains
where to find the tree.

Best regards,
Krzysztof