[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87plaftikz.fsf@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:02:36 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
<vigneshr@...com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai
<wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel
Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, Wentao Liang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>, Johan
Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas
Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/15] mtd: rawnand: sunxi: rework pattern found
registers
Hi Richard,
On 20/10/2025 at 12:13:01 +02, Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com> wrote:
> On H6/H616, the register ECC_PAT_FOUND is at its own address, and not
> part of ECC status register.
> So, introduce the pattern found register offset in sunxi_nfc_caps, along
> with its mask.
>
> Also, introduce a non compile-time field_get() because FIELD_GET() and
> u32_get_bits() don't work with non compile-time constant.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/cover.1739540679.git.geert+renesas@glider.be/
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...tlin.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> index 8f5d8df19e33..4cfb5d3e9c06 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/sunxi_nand.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> +/* non compile-time field get */
> +#define field_get(_mask, _reg) (((_reg) & (_mask)) >> (ffs(_mask) -
> 1))
I see there are already 26 users for this, let's hope it gets merged
soon and this one dropped.
Not a blocker for me.
Miquèl
Powered by blists - more mailing lists