[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3it5l556vmfpuu6kz5yvulwosi4ecmcgfbzcizrc5wi7ifddkh@mpzfxf2v6v3f>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:25:13 +0530
From: "mani@...nel.org" <mani@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Roese <stefan.roese@...lbox.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
"Bandi, Ravi Kumar" <ravib@...zon.com>, "thippeswamy.havalige@....com" <thippeswamy.havalige@....com>,
"lpieralisi@...nel.org" <lpieralisi@...nel.org>, "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "kwilczynski@...nel.org" <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>, "michal.simek@....com" <michal.simek@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: xilinx-xdma: Enable INTx interrupts
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 08:59:19AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> Hi Bjorn,
> Hi Ravi,
>
> On 10/21/25 23:28, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 08:55:41PM +0000, Bandi, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 05:46:17PM +0000, Bandi, Ravi Kumar wrote:
> > > > > > On Oct 21, 2025, at 10:23 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 10:52:32PM +0000, Ravi Kumar Bandi wrote:
> > > > > > > The pcie-xilinx-dma-pl driver does not enable INTx interrupts
> > > > > > > after initializing the port, preventing INTx interrupts from
> > > > > > > PCIe endpoints from flowing through the Xilinx XDMA root port
> > > > > > > bridge. This issue affects kernel 6.6.0 and later versions.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This patch allows INTx interrupts generated by PCIe endpoints
> > > > > > > to flow through the root port. Tested the fix on a board with
> > > > > > > two endpoints generating INTx interrupts. Interrupts are
> > > > > > > properly detected and serviced. The /proc/interrupts output
> > > > > > > shows:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > 32: 320 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 16 Level 400000000.axi-pcie, azdrv
> > > > > > > 52: 470 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 16 Level 500000000.axi-pcie, azdrv
> > > > > > > [...]
>
> First a comment on this IRQ logging:
>
> These lines do NOT refer to the INTx IRQ(s) but the controller internal
> "events" (errors etc). Please see this log for INTx on my Versal
> platform with pci_irqd_intx_xlate added:
>
> 24: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 0 Level LINK_DOWN
> 25: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 3 Level HOT_RESET
> 26: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 8 Level CFG_TIMEOUT
> 27: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 9 Level CORRECTABLE
> 28: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 10 Level NONFATAL
> 29: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 11 Level FATAL
> 30: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 20 Level SLV_UNSUPP
> 31: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 21 Level SLV_UNEXP
> 32: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 22 Level SLV_COMPL
> 33: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 23 Level SLV_ERRP
> 34: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 24 Level SLV_CMPABT
> 35: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 25 Level SLV_ILLBUR
> 36: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 26 Level MST_DECERR
> 37: 0 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 27 Level MST_SLVERR
> 38: 94 0 pl_dma:RC-Event 16 Level 84000000.axi-pcie
> 39: 94 0 pl_dma:INTx 0 Level nvme0q0, nvme0q1
>
> The last line shows the INTx IRQs here ('pl_dma:INTx' vs 'pl_dma:RC-
> Event').
>
> More below...
>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Changes since v1::
> > > > > > > - Fixed commit message per reviewer's comments
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fixes: 8d786149d78c ("PCI: xilinx-xdma: Add Xilinx XDMA Root Port driver")
> > > > > > > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kumar Bandi <ravib@...zon.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Ravi, obviously you tested this, but I don't know how to reconcile
> > > > > > this with Stefan's INTx fix at
> > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251021154322.973640-1-stefan.roese@mailbox.org
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does Stefan's fix need to be squashed into this patch?
> > > > >
> > > > > Sure, we can squash Stefan’s fix into this.
> > > >
> > > > I know we *can* squash them.
> > > >
> > > > I want to know why things worked for you and Stefan when they
> > > > *weren't* squashed:
> > > >
> > > > - Why did INTx work for you even without Stefan's patch. Did you
> > > > get INTx interrupts but not the right ones, e.g., did the device
> > > > signal INTA but it was received as INTB?
> > >
> > > I saw that interrupts were being generated by the endpoint device,
> > > but I didn’t specifically check if they were correctly translated in
> > > the controller. I noticed that the new driver wasn't explicitly
> > > enabling the interrupts, so my first approach was to enable them,
> > > which helped the interrupts flow through.
> >
> > OK, I'll assume the interrupts happened but the driver might not have
> > been able to handle them correctly, e.g., it was prepared for INTA but
> > got INTB or similar.
> >
> > > > - Why did Stefan's patch work for him even without your patch. How
> > > > could Stefan's INTx work without the CSR writes to enable
> > > > interrupts?
> > >
> > > I'm not entirely sure if there are any other dependencies in the
> > > FPGA bitstream. I'll investigate further and get back to you.
> >
> > Stefan clarified in a private message that he had applied your patch
> > first, so this mystery is solved.
>
> Yes. I applied Ravi's patch first and still got no INTx delivered
> to the nvme driver. That's what me triggered to dig deeper here and
> resulted in this v2 patch with pci_irqd_intx_xlate added.
>
> BTW:
> I re-tested just now w/o Ravi's patch and the INTx worked. Still I think
> Ravi's patch is valid and should be applied...
How come INTx is working without the patch from Ravi which enabled INTx routing
in the controller? Was it enabled by default in the hardware?
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
Powered by blists - more mailing lists