[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f4defdc9-2cc0-45a0-a391-cb8678eb1b23@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:14:13 +0530
From: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: tegra: Add ACPI support
On 22/10/25 22:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:06:45PM +0530, Kartik Rajput wrote:
>> Add ACPI support for Tegra RTC, which is available on Tegra241 and
>> Tegra410. Both Tegra241 and Tegra410 use the same ACPI ID 'NVDA0280'.
>> The RTC clock is configured by UEFI before the kernel boots.
>
> Thanks for an update, looks much better now!
> A comment below, though.
>
> ...
>
>> - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> - if (IS_ERR(info->clk))
>> - return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
>> + if (dev_of_node(&pdev->dev)) {
>> + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(info->clk))
>> + return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
>> + }
>>
>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
>
> Since we still call CLK APIs unconditionally here, shouldn't be the whole
> approach just to move to _optional() CLK API?
>
> info->clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>
> I haven't checked the code below, but maybe even one can incorporate _enabled
> to this as well (in a separate change as it's not related to this patch
> directly).
>
Hi Andy,
The reason I did not use the _optional API is because the clocks are required
for the device-tree. Therefore, it must fail if clocks are not provided on
device-tree boot.
Thanks,
Kartik
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists