[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPna3Q9L4Rc9Ufxt@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 10:35:57 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kartik Rajput <kkartik@...dia.com>
Cc: alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
jonathanh@...dia.com, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rtc: tegra: Add ACPI support
On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 12:14:13PM +0530, Kartik Rajput wrote:
> On 22/10/25 22:38, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:06:45PM +0530, Kartik Rajput wrote:
...
> > > - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > > - if (IS_ERR(info->clk))
> > > - return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
> > > + if (dev_of_node(&pdev->dev)) {
> > > + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > > + if (IS_ERR(info->clk))
> > > + return PTR_ERR(info->clk);
> > > + }
> > >
> > > ret = clk_prepare_enable(info->clk);
> >
> > Since we still call CLK APIs unconditionally here, shouldn't be the whole
> > approach just to move to _optional() CLK API?
> >
> > info->clk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> >
> > I haven't checked the code below, but maybe even one can incorporate _enabled
> > to this as well (in a separate change as it's not related to this patch
> > directly).
>
> The reason I did not use the _optional API is because the clocks are required
> for the device-tree. Therefore, it must fail if clocks are not provided on
> device-tree boot.
I see, please mention this in the commit message. And perhaps add a patch to
convert to devm_clk_get_enabled().
On top of that you also can convert driver to use pm_sleep_ptr() and drop ugly
ifdeffery. But this is really out of scope, and up to you to decide.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists