[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025102332-result-palace-789f@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 12:04:19 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
Cc: Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
Deepak Khatri <lorforlinux@...gleboard.org>,
Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>,
Dhruva Gole <d-gole@...com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: fw-download: Fix find firmware req
On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 12:57:57PM +0530, Ayush Singh wrote:
> According to the Greybus Spec published here [0], the Greybus firmware
> download find firmware request should have both tag and format as
> request arguments. However, currently, the linux kernel seems to have
> defined this request incorrectly since format is missing.
Odd, I don't remember that at all, but it was changed here:
https://github.com/projectara/greybus-spec/commit/773b9e0d6cc84a3c7a9f79ea353a552bd66d9de3
maybe we never actually implemented it?
>
> The patch adds format to request and am using it as the file extension of
> the firmware.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/projectara/greybus-spec/blob/ac47bc32dce1256489a82ff1f463fb979e9684ee/source/device_class/firmware.rst?plain=1#L152
>
> Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayush@...gleboard.org>
> ---
> According to the Greybus Spec published here [0], the Greybus firmware
> download find firmware request should have both tag and format as
> request arguments. However, currently, the linux kernel seems to have
> defined this request incorrectly since format is missing.
>
> The patch adds format to request and am using it as the file extension of
> the firmware.
>
> I came across the bug while working on greybus-for-zephyr [1], to get it
> ready for upstreaming as zephyr module.
>
> Open Questions
> ***************
>
> 1. Handle empty format
>
> Not sure what to do in case format is just NULL. Should the request
> fail? There is no reason to not support firmware without extension. So
> personally, I don't think it should be treated as error.
>
> [0]: https://github.com/projectara/greybus-spec/blob/ac47bc32dce1256489a82ff1f463fb979e9684ee/source/device_class/firmware.rst?plain=1#L152
> [1]: https://github.com/Ayush1325/greybus-for-zephyr
As this is a AP-specific thing, it's whatever you want to do I think.
You can handle NULL there, or anything else, it's up to the firmware and
userspace to coordinate this, right?
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/fw-download.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> include/linux/greybus/greybus_protocols.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-download.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-download.c
> index 9a09bd3af79ba0dcf7efa683f4e86246bcd473a5..06f1be8f3121e29551ea8416d5ee2666339b2fe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-download.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/fw-download.c
> @@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ static int exceeds_release_timeout(struct fw_request *fw_req)
>
> /* This returns path of the firmware blob on the disk */
> static struct fw_request *find_firmware(struct fw_download *fw_download,
> - const char *tag)
> + const char *tag, const char *format)
> {
> struct gb_interface *intf = fw_download->connection->bundle->intf;
> struct fw_request *fw_req;
> @@ -178,10 +178,17 @@ static struct fw_request *find_firmware(struct fw_download *fw_download,
> }
> fw_req->firmware_id = ret;
>
> - snprintf(fw_req->name, sizeof(fw_req->name),
> - FW_NAME_PREFIX "%08x_%08x_%08x_%08x_%s.tftf",
> - intf->ddbl1_manufacturer_id, intf->ddbl1_product_id,
> - intf->vendor_id, intf->product_id, tag);
> + if (strnlen(format, GB_FIRMWARE_FORMAT_MAX_SIZE) == 0) {
> + snprintf(fw_req->name, sizeof(fw_req->name),
> + FW_NAME_PREFIX "%08x_%08x_%08x_%08x_%s",
> + intf->ddbl1_manufacturer_id, intf->ddbl1_product_id,
> + intf->vendor_id, intf->product_id, tag);
> + } else {
> + snprintf(fw_req->name, sizeof(fw_req->name),
> + FW_NAME_PREFIX "%08x_%08x_%08x_%08x_%s.%s",
> + intf->ddbl1_manufacturer_id, intf->ddbl1_product_id,
> + intf->vendor_id, intf->product_id, tag, format);
> + }
>
> dev_info(fw_download->parent, "Requested firmware package '%s'\n",
> fw_req->name);
> @@ -225,7 +232,7 @@ static int fw_download_find_firmware(struct gb_operation *op)
> struct gb_fw_download_find_firmware_request *request;
> struct gb_fw_download_find_firmware_response *response;
> struct fw_request *fw_req;
> - const char *tag;
> + const char *tag, *format;
>
> if (op->request->payload_size != sizeof(*request)) {
> dev_err(fw_download->parent,
> @@ -245,7 +252,17 @@ static int fw_download_find_firmware(struct gb_operation *op)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - fw_req = find_firmware(fw_download, tag);
> + format = (const char *)request->format;
> +
> + /* firmware_format must be null-terminated */
> + if (strnlen(format, GB_FIRMWARE_FORMAT_MAX_SIZE) ==
> + GB_FIRMWARE_FORMAT_MAX_SIZE) {
> + dev_err(fw_download->parent,
> + "firmware-format is not null-terminated\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + fw_req = find_firmware(fw_download, tag, format);
> if (IS_ERR(fw_req))
> return PTR_ERR(fw_req);
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/greybus/greybus_protocols.h b/include/linux/greybus/greybus_protocols.h
> index 820134b0105c2caf8cea3ff0985c92d48d3a2d4c..48d91154847dbc7d3c01081eadc69f96dbe41a9f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/greybus/greybus_protocols.h
> +++ b/include/linux/greybus/greybus_protocols.h
> @@ -214,10 +214,12 @@ struct gb_apb_request_cport_flags {
> #define GB_FW_DOWNLOAD_TYPE_RELEASE_FIRMWARE 0x03
>
> #define GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE 10
> +#define GB_FIRMWARE_FORMAT_MAX_SIZE 10
>
> /* firmware download find firmware request/response */
> struct gb_fw_download_find_firmware_request {
> __u8 firmware_tag[GB_FIRMWARE_TAG_MAX_SIZE];
> + __u8 format[GB_FIRMWARE_FORMAT_MAX_SIZE];
Build issues asside (see the 0-day bot report), I am loath to change a
user api like this at the moment, without some sort of guarantee that
this isn't going to break anything.
But, these days, I think your implementation might be one of the few
"real" greybus users that is still alive. The old phones that used the
protocol are no longer being sold from what I can tell, and the "greybus
over IP" stuff didn't actually get used anywhere outside of cool demos
that I know of.
So we might be ok? Or, can you live without any such "format" need?
Have you handled downloading firmware already without this?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists