[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPtiSJl8EwSfVvqN@stanley.mountain>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 14:26:00 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] fs/9p: delete unnnecessary condition
We already know that "retval" is negative, so there is no need to check
again. Also the statement is not indented far enough. Delete it.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
---
fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
index c1acbc98465d..c5bf74d547e8 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_dentry.c
@@ -109,7 +109,6 @@ static int __v9fs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_VFS,
"refresh inode: dentry = %pd (%p), got error %pe\n",
dentry, dentry, ERR_PTR(retval));
- if (retval < 0)
return retval;
}
}
--
2.51.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists