linux-kernel - Questioning Linus, Monolithic Kernel, Agreeing on Kind Communication Guidelines etc?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <719906ac-199e-46ac-a5d2-06700d43570b@bit-tao.eu>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 09:57:21 +0100
From: Ywe Cærlyn <budi@...-tao.eu>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Questioning Linus, Monolithic Kernel, Agreeing on Kind Communication
 Guidelines etc?

As I said in previous mail, the LDA/STA joystick language is not for me.

"Monolithic" kernel, aka one man controlling it that is widely critiqued 
is not something that I agree with either. (So many years for realtime 
patches, then breakpoints outside sched/internals for that, 10ms filter 
in sched.c Rust & Germ symbols etc!)

One needs Kind Communication Guidelines, from GNU. GNU actually seems to 
be the Bit concept I am about, worded as a variant of "GOD".

It would even be better to drop the concept GOD entirely and rather do a 
sane alternative, doing actually someething about this. Linus really is 
L, of aLLA. You can actually try this, and it would be the L segment of 
The Coran only. Which again could be the part about an operating system.

L X actually really being Bitstreams System, a result of my work with 
popularizing the computer Bit, so we can use the native term.

The whole philosohpy (optimally translated) is on my page. Bit Tao a 
macro for all.

https://bit-tao.eu/

LIGHT!