[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <749bdc31-e34d-449b-9ab8-ba542276ee8d@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 09:50:36 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@...era.com>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] dt-bindings: net: altr,socfpga-stmmac: allow
dma-coherent property
On 24/10/2025 13:49, Steffen Trumtrar wrote:
> The DMA operations on the SoCFPGA stmmac can be dma-coherent. Add as
> optional property.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@...gutronix.de>
There is little point in mixing two subsystems in one patchset.
Especially without marking this net-next how maintainers are supposed to
take it?
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists