[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQABKgQYfVkO7n9m@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:32:58 -0400
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>, Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@....com>,
Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>, Barry Song <baohua@...nel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@...ux.dev>,
Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>,
Kairui Song <kasong@...cent.com>, Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Chris Li <chrisl@...nel.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>, Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>,
Ying Huang <ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] remove is_swap_[pte, pmd]() + non-swap
confusion
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 01:09:23PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> I'm not keen on is_non_present_entry(), it seems confusing again.
>
The confusion stems from `present` referring to the state of the hardware
PTE bits, instead of referring to the state of the entry.
But even if we're stuck with "non-present entry", it's still infinitely
more understandable (and teachable) than "non_swap_swap_entry".
So even if we never get to the point of replacing swp_entry_t, this is a
clear and obvious improvement.
~Gregory
Powered by blists - more mailing lists