linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: document @chan parameter in iio_backend_oversampling_ratio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75VcB9yLZq31zHa8wuE2DtxJ0j5hoco3q=F4WG8yDuTrtkg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:53:50 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@...il.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, 
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: document @chan parameter in iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set

On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 5:12 PM Kriish Sharma
<kriish.sharma2006@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 7:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > Is this the only issue with the kernel-doc? Can you run manually
> > scripts/kernel-doc against this file (with -Wall) and check, please?
> > The change itself is okay, FWIW,
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
>
> Thanks for the review!
> Looks like I missed another warning in the latest linux-next:
> Warning: drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c:1069 No description found
> for return value of 'iio_backend_get_priv'
> I can send another patch to address this if you’d like.

You can combine in one patch, there are no strict objections for
fixing all (small) kernel-doc issues in one file at once.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko