linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iio: document @chan parameter in iio_backend_oversampling_ratio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL4kbRNi+B1Fm9fnEvmLS_n1SWQnb+BC=xht4=qJOrnEUqqGhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:55:15 +0530
From: Kriish Sharma <kriish.sharma2006@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, 
	Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...s.st.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, 
	David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: document @chan parameter in iio_backend_oversampling_ratio_set

Thanks, Andy
I've sent a v2 that combines both kernel-doc fixes into a single patch.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251027092159.918445-1-kriish.sharma2006@gmail.com/



On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 5:12 PM Kriish Sharma
> <kriish.sharma2006@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 25, 2025 at 7:05 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > > Is this the only issue with the kernel-doc? Can you run manually
> > > scripts/kernel-doc against this file (with -Wall) and check, please?
> > > The change itself is okay, FWIW,
> > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
> >
> > Thanks for the review!
> > Looks like I missed another warning in the latest linux-next:
> > Warning: drivers/iio/industrialio-backend.c:1069 No description found
> > for return value of 'iio_backend_get_priv'
> > I can send another patch to address this if you’d like.
>
> You can combine in one patch, there are no strict objections for
> fixing all (small) kernel-doc issues in one file at once.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko