lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aP9d3-deezGtCbHr@gen8>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:56:15 +0000
From: Drew Fustini <fustini@...nel.org>
To: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Fu Wei <wefu@...hat.com>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>,
	Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@...sung.com>,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>,
	Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Han Gao <gaohan@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] riscv: dts: thead: Add reset controllers of more
 subsystems for TH1520

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 01:10:32PM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> Describe reset controllers for VI, MISC, AP, DSP and AO subsystems. The
> one for AO subsystem is marked as reserved, since it may be used by AON
> firmware.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> index e680d1a7c821..15d64eaea89f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/thead/th1520.dtsi
> @@ -277,6 +277,12 @@ clint: timer@...c000000 {
>  					      <&cpu3_intc 3>, <&cpu3_intc 7>;
>  		};
>  
> +		rst_vi: reset-controller@...4040100 {
> +			compatible = "thead,th1520-reset-vi";
> +			reg = <0xff 0xe4040100 0x0 0x8>;

Is this intentional so that the first VI_SUBSYS register, VISYS_SW_RST
at offset 0x100, will have an offset of 0 from the thead,th1520-reset-vi
reg in the driver?

[snip]
> +		rst_dsp: reset-controller@...f040028 {
> +			compatible = "thead,th1520-reset-dsp";
> +			reg = <0xff 0xef040028 0x0 0x4>;

Similar to rst_vi, is this intentional so that the first register,
DSPSYS_SW_RST at offset 0x28, will have an offset of 0 in the driver?

Thanks,
Drew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ