linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add/fix core comments for {Panther,Nova} Lake

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19c03c72-9fe3-4712-872e-324e65030dc0@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 20:44:31 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: dave.hansen@...el.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
 tony.luck@...el.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Add/fix core comments for {Panther,Nova} Lake

> Is it even worth keeping the core names in there? This is an example
> where they're causing churn. If nobody cares, maybe we should just
> zap them, or at least stop putting them in there for new CPUs.

Personally speaking, I find it very useful to have the cross reference
all in one place.

This file is the most concise source of information I'm aware of.

~Andrew