[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQB6JdePRUuegGxn@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 10:09:09 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] units: Add value of π * 10⁹
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 09:59:10AM -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> On 10/27/25 9:52 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:34:51 +0100
> > Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There are a few drivers that want to have this value, and at least one
> >> known to come soon. Let's define a value for them.
> >
> > Is there any way we can make the x10^9 bit obvious in the naming? Or do
> > something a bit nasty like defining a macro along the lines of
> >
> > PI(scale)?
> > e.g. PI(NANO), PI(10000)
> >
> This was my first thought when looking at this as well.
>
> Or something like PI_x10(6).
We need a good macro that may _at compile-time_ convert 64-bit input to 32-bit
value that may be suitable for 32-bit arithmetics / architectures.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists