lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <eogx5ttdbjbqr44ezsgapzkk52ni5qrxzd7idhh75wkahkqtdb@viti7syvp2li>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:06:02 +0100
From: "Winiarski, Michal" <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>
CC: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, "De Marchi, Lucas"
	<lucas.demarchi@...el.com>, Thomas Hellström
	<thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>, "Vivi, Rodrigo" <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
	"intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "Brost, Matthew"
	<matthew.brost@...el.com>, "Wajdeczko, Michal" <Michal.Wajdeczko@...el.com>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, "Jani
 Nikula" <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
	<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, "Laguna,
 Lukasz" <lukasz.laguna@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/26] drm/xe/pf: Remove GuC version check for
 migration support

On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 03:33:22AM +0100, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Winiarski, Michal <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 6:41 AM
> > 
> >  static bool pf_check_migration_support(struct xe_gt *gt)
> >  {
> > -	/* GuC 70.25 with save/restore v2 is required */
> > -	xe_gt_assert(gt, GUC_FIRMWARE_VER(&gt->uc.guc) >=
> > MAKE_GUC_VER(70, 25, 0));
> > -
> >  	/* XXX: for now this is for feature enabling only */
> >  	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_XE_DEBUG);
> 
> why putting it under a debug option? Now you are sending formal
> series for merge, assuming good quality.

The need for debug option is removed for specific platforms in Patch
24/26, but I will drop it completely in v3.

-Michał

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ