[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZD=ynKyJXGneQMwX6NbHaOPNr4jxnP_90Ed860kpKUN3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 11:34:49 +0200
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>, Frank Li <frank.li@....com>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Add runtime ops copy to
support dynamic behavior
Hi Peng,
One comment.
> @@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
> u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
> u32 core_index;
> struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
> + struct imx_rproc_plat_ops ops;
> };
Here do you plan to change a member of the ops table at runtime?
Like e.g replace just the start ops? Or the entire table.
Because it would be better to add something like this:
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
u32 entry; /* cpu start address */
u32 core_index;
struct dev_pm_domain_list *pd_list;
- struct imx_rproc_plat_ops ops;
+ const struct imx_rproc_plat_ops *ops;
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists