[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c361ea17-7480-4a10-b446-5072e8edd76d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:47:45 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd
 <sboyd@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona <jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: Update the SDCC clock to use
 shared_floor_ops
On 10/29/25 10:37 AM, Taniya Das wrote:
> Fix "gcc_sdcc2_apps_clk_src: rcg didn't update its configuration" during
> boot. This happens due to the floor_ops tries to update the rcg
> configuration even if the clock is not enabled.
> The shared_floor_ops ensures that the RCG is safely parked and the new
> parent configuration is cached in the parked_cfg when the clock is off.
> 
> Ensure to use the ops for the other SDCC clock instances as well.
> 
> Fixes: 39d6dcf67fe9 ("clk: qcom: gcc: Add support for QCS615 GCC clocks")
> Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
I noticed none of SM8[1234567]50 / hamoa / glymur uses _shared_ here.. 
I see that e.g. SM8250's downstream sets it though - should some of
these be fixed up too?
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
