[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <557ff048-7e5d-409e-bf21-98328a834bc8@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:01:03 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
        Taniya Das
	<taniya.das@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Dmitry Baryshkov <lumag@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ajit Pandey <ajit.pandey@....qualcomm.com>,
        Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@....qualcomm.com>,
        Jagadeesh Kona
	<jagadeesh.kona@....qualcomm.com>,
        Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] clk: qcom: gcc-qcs615: Update the SDCC clock to use
 shared_floor_ops
On 10/29/2025 3:17 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> I noticed none of SM8[1234567]50 / hamoa / glymur uses _shared_ here.. 
> 
> I see that e.g. SM8250's downstream sets it though - should some of
> these be fixed up too?
I wanted to fix them as well, just trying to check the downstream
history of these clocks and then update them.
Regards,
Taniya.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
