[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6297468b-77d0-4202-8ec1-3e731acc43de@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 17:12:31 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Add USB support for
SM8750 QRD platform
On 10/29/2025 1:37 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/10/2025 17:15, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>> From: Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@....qualcomm.com>
>>
>> Enable USB support on SM8750 QRD variant. The current definition
>> will start the USB controller in peripheral mode by default until
>> dependencies are added, such as USB role detection.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@....qualcomm.com>
>> [Krishna: Flattened usb node QRD DTS]
>> Signed-off-by: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com>
>
> NAK.
>
> You ignored every previous tag - multiple reviews and tests, and then...
>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750-qrd.dts | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750-qrd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750-qrd.dts
>> index 13c7b9664c89..fc5d12bb41a5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750-qrd.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750-qrd.dts
>> @@ -1054,3 +1054,25 @@ &ufs_mem_hc {
>>
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>> +
>> +&usb_1 {
>> + dr_mode = "peripheral";
>
> You sent something different with issues.
>
> Really, this was a correct patch. Was reviewed. Why you decided to drop
> all this, drop everything which was correct?
>
> Your explanation:
> "- Removed obtained RB tags since the code has changed significantly."
> is just wrong. Almost NOTHING changed, except completely unimportant two
> node merging.
>
> NAK
>
Apologies Krzysztof,
On first patch that adds changes to base DTSI, there were changes moving
to newer bindings and merging child node and parent node. I should've
removed RB tags received on that patch only. But I was over cautious and
misinterpreted the rules and removed them on the other patches as well.
Will be careful the next time.
Also is there any issue with marking dr_mode as peripheral here in usb_1
node ?
Regards,
Krishna,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists