linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Guaranteed CMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQNwhQcN8Su_Il6c@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 07:04:53 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...hat.com, lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com,
	Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, vbabka@...e.cz, alexandru.elisei@....com,
	peterx@...hat.com, sj@...nel.org, rppt@...nel.org, mhocko@...e.com,
	corbet@....net, axboe@...nel.dk, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
	brauner@...nel.org, jack@...e.cz, willy@...radead.org,
	m.szyprowski@...sung.com, robin.murphy@....com, hannes@...xchg.org,
	zhengqi.arch@...edance.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
	axelrasmussen@...gle.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
	minchan@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Guaranteed CMA

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 07:57:34AM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 2:23 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 12:51:17PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > I'm guessing you missed my reply to your comment in the previous
> > > submission: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAJuCfpFs5aKv8E96YC_pasNjH6=eukTuS2X8f=nBGiiuE0Nwhg@mail.gmail.com/
> > > Please check it out and follow up here or on the original thread.
> >
> > I didn't feel to comment on it.  Please don't just build abstractions
> > on top of abstractions for no reason.  If you later have to introduce
> > them add them when they are actually needed.
> 
> Ok, if it makes it easier to review the code, I'll do it. So, I can:
> 1. merge cleancache code (patch 1) with the GCMA code (patch 7). This
> way all the logic will be together.
> 2. . LRU additiona (patch 2) and readahead support (patch 3) can stay
> as incremental additions to GCMA, sysfs interface (patch 4) and
> cleancache documentation (

Sounds good.