[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <90143686.3161766.1761833369803@kpc.webmail.kpnmail.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:09:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Jori Koolstra <jkoolstra@...all.nl>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	"skhan@...uxfoundation.org" <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Khalid Aziz <khalid@...nel.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Taotao Chen <chentaotao@...iglobal.com>,
	NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	syzbot+4e49728ec1cbaf3b91d2@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add error handling to minix filesystem similar to ext4
> 
> I don't see a licensing issue. It's BSD licensed. Also, this is a
> userland code, so we wouldn't need to worry about that too much.
>
Oh, my bad. I thought Minix (the OS) had some licensing incompatibilities
with Linux, and this repo takes code from Minix. But that may be long in
the past.
> 
> You're quite right though that userland replacements will need to meet
> some criteria before we can rip out the in-kernel versions. This might
> be a good discussion topic for next year's LSF/MM!
Would an in-tree but out of kernel implementation be an idea? Like how
kselftest is integrated in the code, even though most of that also takes
place in userland. That would guarantee a level of support, at least for
the time being. I could take the code, verify it, and write some tests
for in selftest.
And there is still the issue of what we do for the syzbot bugs until a
more permanent solution is achieved.
Anyway, this probably goes over my head as a clueless beginner. Just
trying to see where I can help. Thanks a lot Jeff for you answers, I
appreciate it.
Jori.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
