linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: qat - use simple_strtoull to improve qat_uclo_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aQNxx+sTMydyG2ub@gcabiddu-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 14:10:15 +0000
From: Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>, Herbert Xu
	<herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Jack
 Xu" <jack.xu@...el.com>, Suman Kumar Chakraborty
	<suman.kumar.chakraborty@...el.com>, Qianfeng Rong <rongqianfeng@...o.com>,
	<qat-linux@...el.com>, <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: qat - use simple_strtoull to improve
 qat_uclo_parse_num

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:03:10PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:27:37AM +0000, Giovanni Cabiddu wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 11:02:16AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 02:57:07AM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> > > > Replace the manual string copying and parsing logic with a call to
> > > > simple_strtoull() to simplify and improve qat_uclo_parse_num().
> > > > 
> > > > Ensure that the parsed number does not exceed UINT_MAX, and add an
> > > > approximate upper-bound check (no more than 19 digits) to guard against
> > > > overflow.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by; Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > s/;/:
> > 
> > I just noticed this while applying the patch to my local tree.
> > 
> > Due to the typo, patchwork is not applying your tag [1].
> 
> Oh, thanks for catching this. Have you added it manually or should I do
> something about it?
I haven't added it manually. If you reply with your tag again it will
get sorted.

Thanks!

-- 
Giovanni