[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad1bb032-6d58-435b-b2bc-04aa26d41d58@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:04:39 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Albert Yang <yangzh0906@...ndersoft.com>, krzk@...nel.org
Cc: krzk+dt@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
 arnd@...db.de, robh@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, gordon.ge@....ai,
 bst-upstream@...ai.top, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 ulf.hansson@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: introduce Black Sesame Technologies C1200
 SoC and CDCU1.0 board
On 30/10/2025 12:40, Albert Yang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Gentle ping on this series. It's been two weeks since v5 was posted.
> 
> This version addresses the DTS coding style and property ordering issues
> from our previous discussion [1]. Following Arnd's suggestion [2], the MMC
> patches have been removed and will be submitted separately.
> 
> Patch 2/6 (arm bindings) already has your Reviewed-by. The remaining
> patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig, and MAINTAINERS) are ready for review
> when you have time.
I don't understand this ping. You received the reviewed from me or other
maintainers, where we were responsible to give such review. Probably you
assume that my job is to review something else here, but sorry, that's
not my job at the time of this patchset was prepared (we don't count
here recent changes because that would mean you ping me after few days...).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
