linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: introduce Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC and CDCU1.0 board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251031043803.781326-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:38:03 +0800
From: Albert Yang <yangzh0906@...ndersoft.com>
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc: arnd@...db.de,
	bst-upstream@...ai.top,
	catalin.marinas@....com,
	conor+dt@...nel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	gordon.ge@....ai,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	krzk@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	robh@...nel.org,
	ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
	will@...nel.org,
	yangzh0906@...ndersoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: introduce Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC and CDCU1.0 board

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 04:04:39PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 30/10/2025 12:40, Albert Yang wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > Gentle ping on this series. It's been two weeks since v5 was posted.
> >
> > This version addresses the DTS coding style and property ordering issues
> > from our previous discussion [1]. Following Arnd's suggestion [2], the MMC
> > patches have been removed and will be submitted separately.
> >
> > Patch 2/6 (arm bindings) already has your Reviewed-by. The remaining
> > patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig, and MAINTAINERS) are ready for review
> > when you have time.
>
> I don't understand this ping. You received the reviewed from me or other
> maintainers, where we were responsible to give such review. Probably you
> assume that my job is to review something else here, but sorry, that's
> not my job at the time of this patchset was prepared (we don't count
> here recent changes because that would mean you ping me after few days...).
>

My apologies for the confusion. You're absolutely right about the
maintainer responsibilities.

I should clarify why I pinged you: You provided valuable feedback on
earlier versions of this series, including the DTS patches. Since those
changes were made based on your input but hadn't received confirmation,
I wanted to make sure they properly addressed your concerns. However, I
now understand that the SoC-specific patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig,
MAINTAINERS) should be reviewed by the ARM SoC maintainers.

Thank you for your reviews and for clarifying the proper process. I'll
follow up with Arnd for the remaining patches.

Best regards,
Albert