[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251031045253.789621-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:52:53 +0800
From: Albert Yang <yangzh0906@...ndersoft.com>
To: arnd@...db.de
Cc: soc@...ts.linux.dev,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org,
krzk@...nel.org,
robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
yangzh0906@...ndersoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] arm64: introduce Black Sesame Technologies C1200 SoC and CDCU1.0 board
Hi Arnd,
Following up on the v5 series for BST C1200 SoC support. The dt-bindings
patches have received the necessary reviews (Rob's Acked-by for 1/6 and
Krzysztof's Reviewed-by for 2/6).
I now understand that the SoC-specific patches (Kconfig, DTS, defconfig,
MAINTAINERS) should be reviewed by the ARM SoC maintainers rather than
the DT bindings reviewers. Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding the
process.
In your previous feedback [1], you mentioned you'd be happy to merge the
SoC portions in arch/arm64 and suggested resubmitting for 6.19 once
6.18-rc1 is out. Could you advise on the next steps? Is there anything
I should prepare or address before the 6.19 merge window?
If I've misunderstood anything about the process, please let me know.
Series: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20251016120558.2390960-1-yangzh0906@thundersoft.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/09b1318e-21dc-4354-8733-866b70696295@app.fastmail.com/
Thanks,
Albert
Powered by blists - more mailing lists