[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQONGWu1lM27erA3@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 17:06:49 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/idle: disable tick in idle=poll idle entry
(Adding more people in Cc)
Le Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:00:56PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti a écrit :
>
> Commit a5183862e76fdc25f36b39c2489b816a5c66e2e5
> ("tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit") allows
> a nohz_full CPU to enter idle and return from it with the
> scheduler tick disabled (since the tick might be undesired noise).
>
> The idle=poll case still unconditionally restarts the tick when entering
> idle.
>
> To reduce the noise for that case as well, stop the tick when entering
> idle, for the idle=poll case.
>
> Change tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu to set NEED_RESCHED bit, to handle the
> case where a new timer is added from an interrupt. This breaks out of
> cpu_idle_poll and rearms the timer if necessary.
>
> ---
>
> v2: Handle the case where a new timer is added from an interrupt (Frederic Weisbecker)
>
> include/linux/sched.h | 2 ++
> kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
> kernel/sched/idle.c | 2 +-
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index cbb7340c5866..1f6938dc20cd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2428,4 +2428,6 @@ extern void migrate_enable(void);
>
> DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(migrate, migrate_disable(), migrate_enable())
>
> +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index f1ebf67b48e2..f0b84600084b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -988,6 +988,11 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> return true;
> }
>
> +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu)
> +{
> + set_nr_if_polling(cpu_rq(cpu)->idle);
> +}
> +
> #else
> static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
> {
> @@ -999,6 +1004,11 @@ static inline bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> {
> return false;
> }
> +
> +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu)
> +{
> + set_tsk_need_resched(cpu_rq(cpu)->idle);
> +}
> #endif
>
> static bool __wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index c39b089d4f09..428c2d1cbd1b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void do_idle(void)
> * idle as we know that the IPI is going to arrive right away.
> */
> if (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()) {
> - tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick();
> + tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
Shouldn't we simply remove the tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick() line? The nohz_full
CPU should have entered here with the tick disabled already.
Also non-nohz_full systems shouldn't care.
> cpu_idle_poll();
> } else {
> cpuidle_idle_call();
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index c527b421c865..efc3653999dc 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
> if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> return;
>
> + set_tif_resched_if_polling(cpu);
Perhaps stuff that within wake_up_full_nohz_cpu() and call
set_nr_if_polling() directly. Also this needs a big comment.
Thanks.
> irq_work_queue_on(&per_cpu(nohz_full_kick_work, cpu), cpu);
> }
>
>
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists