[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bjlly2hx.ffs@tglx>
Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2025 20:30:34 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, Frederic Weisbecker
<frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/idle: disable tick in idle=poll idle entry
On Wed, Oct 29 2025 at 15:00, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Commit a5183862e76fdc25f36b39c2489b816a5c66e2e5
> ("tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit") allows
> a nohz_full CPU to enter idle and return from it with the
> scheduler tick disabled (since the tick might be undesired noise).
>
> The idle=poll case still unconditionally restarts the tick when entering
> idle.
>
> To reduce the noise for that case as well, stop the tick when entering
> idle, for the idle=poll case.
>
> Change tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu to set NEED_RESCHED bit, to handle the
> case where a new timer is added from an interrupt. This breaks out of
> cpu_idle_poll and rearms the timer if necessary.
>
> ---
ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line by nominal patch author 'Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>'
You've not started doing kernel development three days ago, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists