lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQiSPucmKCy4Rn6u@tpad>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 08:30:06 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/idle: disable tick in idle=poll idle entry

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 05:06:49PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> (Adding more people in Cc)
> 
> Le Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 03:00:56PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti a écrit :
> > 
> > Commit a5183862e76fdc25f36b39c2489b816a5c66e2e5 
> > ("tick/nohz: Conditionally restart tick on idle exit") allows
> > a nohz_full CPU to enter idle and return from it with the 
> > scheduler tick disabled (since the tick might be undesired noise).
> > 
> > The idle=poll case still unconditionally restarts the tick when entering
> > idle.
> > 
> > To reduce the noise for that case as well, stop the tick when entering
> > idle, for the idle=poll case.
> > 
> > Change tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu to set NEED_RESCHED bit, to handle the
> > case where a new timer is added from an interrupt. This breaks out of
> > cpu_idle_poll and rearms the timer if necessary.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > v2: Handle the case where a new timer is added from an interrupt (Frederic Weisbecker)
> > 
> >  include/linux/sched.h    |    2 ++
> >  kernel/sched/core.c      |   10 ++++++++++
> >  kernel/sched/idle.c      |    2 +-
> >  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |    1 +
> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index cbb7340c5866..1f6938dc20cd 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -2428,4 +2428,6 @@ extern void migrate_enable(void);
> >  
> >  DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_0(migrate, migrate_disable(), migrate_enable())
> >  
> > +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu);
> > +
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index f1ebf67b48e2..f0b84600084b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -988,6 +988,11 @@ static bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> >  	return true;
> >  }
> >  
> > +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +	set_nr_if_polling(cpu_rq(cpu)->idle);
> > +}
> > +
> >  #else
> >  static inline bool set_nr_and_not_polling(struct thread_info *ti, int tif)
> >  {
> > @@ -999,6 +1004,11 @@ static inline bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
> >  {
> >  	return false;
> >  }
> > +
> > +void set_tif_resched_if_polling(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +	set_tsk_need_resched(cpu_rq(cpu)->idle);
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  static bool __wake_q_add(struct wake_q_head *head, struct task_struct *task)
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> > index c39b089d4f09..428c2d1cbd1b 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> > @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@ static void do_idle(void)
> >  		 * idle as we know that the IPI is going to arrive right away.
> >  		 */
> >  		if (cpu_idle_force_poll || tick_check_broadcast_expired()) {
> > -			tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick();
> > +			tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick();
> 
> Shouldn't we simply remove the tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick() line? The nohz_full
> CPU should have entered here with the tick disabled already.
> 
> Also non-nohz_full systems shouldn't care.

With tick_nohz_idle_restart_tick removed:

<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.356672: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler expires=51360062500 softexpires=51360062500 mode=ABS
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.357671: hrtimer_cancel: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.357671: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler now=51360063398
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.357671: hrtimer_expire_exit: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.357671: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler expires=51361062500 softexpires=51361062500 mode=ABS
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.358671: hrtimer_cancel: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.358671: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler now=51361063420
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.358672: hrtimer_expire_exit: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.358672: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler expires=51362062500 softexpires=51362062500 mode=ABS
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.359671: hrtimer_cancel: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.359671: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler now=51362063447
<idle>-0 [001] d.h1. 51.359672: hrtimer_expire_exit: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418
<idle>-0 [001] d.h2. 51.359672: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=ffff927ae205c418 function=tick_nohz_handler expires=51363062500 softexpires=51363062500 mode=ABS

CPU 1 is idle and isolated.

> >  			cpu_idle_poll();
> >  		} else {
> >  			cpuidle_idle_call();
> > diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > index c527b421c865..efc3653999dc 100644
> > --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> > @@ -408,6 +408,7 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_cpu(int cpu)
> >  	if (!tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
> >  		return;
> >  
> > +	set_tif_resched_if_polling(cpu);
> 
> Perhaps stuff that within wake_up_full_nohz_cpu() and call
> set_nr_if_polling() directly.

Can't call set_nr_if_polling() directly since if TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is
undefined:

static inline bool set_nr_if_polling(struct task_struct *p)
{
        return false;
}

So the wakeup won't occur. Or am i missing something?


> Also this needs a big comment.

Sure!

Thanks.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ