linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: enetc: add port MDIO support for both i.MX94 and i.MX95

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6db67ec-9eb0-4730-af18-31214afe2e09@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:43:48 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@....com, vladimir.oltean@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, aziz.sellami@....com,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] net: enetc: add port MDIO support for both
 i.MX94 and i.MX95

> Similar to the external MDIO registers, each ENETC has a set of internal
> MDIO registers to access its on-die PHY (PCS), so internal MDIO support
> is also added.

Any reason to not just hard code it to 0?
What is the reset default?

DT describes hardware, not configuration. So getting this from DT
seems wrong.

    Andrew