[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQP3eJmLTHscDoI4@google.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 16:40:40 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "frankja@...ux.ibm.com" <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
"maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>, "borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"pjw@...nel.org" <pjw@...nel.org>, "aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>, "maobibo@...ngson.cn" <maobibo@...ngson.cn>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "maddy@...ux.ibm.com" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>,
"palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>, "imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
"zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn" <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>, "anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>,
"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, Yan Y Zhao <yan.y.zhao@...el.com>,
"michael.roth@....com" <michael.roth@....com>,
"binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"ackerleytng@...gle.com" <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/28] KVM: TDX: WARN if mirror SPTE doesn't have full
RWX when creating S-EPT mapping
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-10-30 at 13:09 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Pass in the mirror_spte to kvm_x86_ops.set_external_spte() to provide
> > symmetry with .remove_external_spte(), and assert in TDX that the mirror
> > SPTE is shadow-present with full RWX permissions (the TDX-Module doesn't
> > allow the hypervisor to control protections).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
>
> [...]
>
> > static int tdx_sept_set_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> > - enum pg_level level, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> > + enum pg_level level, u64 mirror_spte)
> > {
> > struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm);
> > + kvm_pfn_t pfn = spte_to_pfn(mirror_spte);
> >
> > /* TODO: handle large pages. */
> > if (KVM_BUG_ON(level != PG_LEVEL_4K, kvm))
> > return -EIO;
> >
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(mirror_spte) ||
> > + (mirror_spte & VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK) != VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK);
> > +
>
> Nit:
>
> I am a little bit confused about when to use WARN_ON_ONCE() and
> KVM_BUG_ON(). :-)
Very loosely: WARN if there's a decent chance carrying on might be fine,
KVM_BUG_ON() if there's a good chance carrying on will crash the host and/or
corrupt the guest, e.g. if KVM suspects a hardware/TDX-Module issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists