[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00f4bddd2e7bf7ab1b1718f97bb14f2c85bbf0f3.camel@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 23:59:35 +0000
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>
CC: "borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com" <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
"kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "michael.roth@....com"
<michael.roth@....com>, "kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev" <kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oliver.upton@...ux.dev" <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, "palmer@...belt.com"
<palmer@...belt.com>, "binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com"
<binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, "chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
"aou@...s.berkeley.edu" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"maddy@...ux.ibm.com" <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>, "maobibo@...ngson.cn"
<maobibo@...ngson.cn>, "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
"linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
<yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "frankja@...ux.ibm.com" <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
"anup@...infault.org" <anup@...infault.org>, "pjw@...nel.org"
<pjw@...nel.org>, "zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn" <zhaotianrui@...ngson.cn>,
"ackerleytng@...gle.com" <ackerleytng@...gle.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"loongarch@...ts.linux.dev" <loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
"imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com" <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, "Edgecombe, Rick P"
<rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/28] KVM: TDX: WARN if mirror SPTE doesn't have full
RWX when creating S-EPT mapping
On Thu, 2025-10-30 at 16:40 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Thu, 2025-10-30 at 13:09 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Pass in the mirror_spte to kvm_x86_ops.set_external_spte() to provide
> > > symmetry with .remove_external_spte(), and assert in TDX that the mirror
> > > SPTE is shadow-present with full RWX permissions (the TDX-Module doesn't
> > > allow the hypervisor to control protections).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > static int tdx_sept_set_private_spte(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> > > - enum pg_level level, kvm_pfn_t pfn)
> > > + enum pg_level level, u64 mirror_spte)
> > > {
> > > struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(kvm);
> > > + kvm_pfn_t pfn = spte_to_pfn(mirror_spte);
> > >
> > > /* TODO: handle large pages. */
> > > if (KVM_BUG_ON(level != PG_LEVEL_4K, kvm))
> > > return -EIO;
> > >
> > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(mirror_spte) ||
> > > + (mirror_spte & VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK) != VMX_EPT_RWX_MASK);
> > > +
> >
> > Nit:
> >
> > I am a little bit confused about when to use WARN_ON_ONCE() and
> > KVM_BUG_ON(). :-)
>
> Very loosely: WARN if there's a decent chance carrying on might be fine,
> KVM_BUG_ON() if there's a good chance carrying on will crash the host and/or
> corrupt the guest, e.g. if KVM suspects a hardware/TDX-Module issue.
Makes sense. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists