[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251030001759.GDaQKut2wDtopc0qn6@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 01:17:59 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	mjguzik@...il.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	willy@...radead.org, raghavendra.kt@....com,
	boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/mm: Simplify clear_page_*
On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:26:38PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
> After this change the only remaining functions in x86/lib/clear_page_64.S are
> this one and rep_stos_alternative.
> 
> And so the _orig suffix seemed to be a little confusing. That's why the
> change to the more functional name.
No, as said,  having "clear_page" somewhere there in the name should stay. It
can be "__clear_page" or something along those lines but not something
completely different.
Thx.
-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
