[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <873471ge1o.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 22:21:39 -0700
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, x86@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        david@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, mjguzik@...il.com, luto@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, willy@...radead.org, raghavendra.kt@....com,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/7] x86/mm: Simplify clear_page_*
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 04:26:38PM -0700, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> After this change the only remaining functions in x86/lib/clear_page_64.S are
>> this one and rep_stos_alternative.
>>
>> And so the _orig suffix seemed to be a little confusing. That's why the
>> change to the more functional name.
>
> No, as said,  having "clear_page" somewhere there in the name should stay. It
> can be "__clear_page" or something along those lines but not something
> completely different.
Sounds good. Will change.
--
ankur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
