[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251030074519.GA47@bytedance>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 15:45:19 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <ziqianlu@...edance.com>
To: Hao Jia <jiahao.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@...ux.dev>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Chuyi Zhou <zhouchuyi@...edance.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
	Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@...mens.com>,
	Songtang Liu <liusongtang@...edance.com>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>,
	Matteo Martelli <matteo.martelli@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/fair: Prevent cfs_rq from being unthrottled
 with zero runtime_remaining
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 02:51:02PM +0800, Hao Jia wrote:
> It worked well in my test cases, and the non-empty throttled_limbo_list
> warning no longer appeared.
> 
> Tested-by: Hao Jia <jiahao1@...iang.com>
Thanks Hao, it's great to get your confirm that this also works for
your case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
