[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <176195118797.233084.5136305180547007153.b4-ty@sntech.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 23:53:20 +0100
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
Quentin Schulz <foss+kernel@...il.net>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@...rry.de>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: include rk3399-base instead of rk3399 in rk3399-op1
On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 14:50:59 +0100, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> In commit 296602b8e5f7 ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Move RK3399 OPPs to dtsi
> files for SoC variants"), everything shared between variants of RK3399
> was put into rk3399-base.dtsi and the rest in variant-specific DTSI,
> such as rk3399-t, rk3399-op1, rk3399, etc.
> Therefore, the variant-specific DTSI should include rk3399-base.dtsi and
> not another variant's DTSI.
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] arm64: dts: rockchip: include rk3399-base instead of rk3399 in rk3399-op1
commit: 08d70143e3033d267507deb98a5fd187df3e6640
Best regards,
--
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists