linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: firmware: dmi_scan: Add support for reading SMBIOS from DT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAC_iWjKEK6ardoCS9YUArhU-5UJfdb8cCGiiH=Ly=KkXTh=hvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 11:31:11 +0200
From: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
To: adriana <adriana@...sta.com>
Cc: ardb@...nel.org, trini@...sulko.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk@...nel.org, 
	jdelvare@...e.com, frowand.list@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, vasilykh@...sta.com, arm.ebbr-discuss@....com, 
	boot-architecture@...ts.linaro.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, 
	uefi-discuss@...ts.uefi.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] drivers: firmware: dmi_scan: Add support for
 reading SMBIOS from DT

Hi Adriana,

On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 10:41, adriana <adriana@...sta.com> wrote:
>
> From: Adriana Nicolae <adriana@...sta.com>

We'll need a description of why the change is needed here.

[...]

>
>  #ifndef SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START
>  #define SMBIOS_ENTRY_POINT_SCAN_START 0xF0000
> @@ -670,6 +673,54 @@ static int __init dmi_smbios3_present(const u8 *buf)
>         return 1;
>  }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> +/**
> + * dmi_scan_from_dt - Find and parse DMI/SMBIOS tables from the Device Tree
> + *
> + * Checks if the bootloader has passed SMBIOS table addresses via the /chosen
> + * node in the Device Tree. This follows the standard kernel DT bindings and
> + * assumes a fixed 32-byte mapping for the entry point.
> + * Returns true if a valid table is found and successfully parsed.
> + */
> +static bool __init dmi_scan_from_dt(void)
> +{
> +       struct device_node *chosen;
> +       const __be64 *prop;
> +       char buf[32];
> +       void __iomem *p;
> +       bool dmi_available = false;
> +       u64 addr;
> +       int len;
> +
> +       chosen = of_find_node_by_path("/chosen");
> +       if (!chosen)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       prop = of_get_property(chosen, "linux,smbios3-table", &len);
> +       if (prop && len >= sizeof(u64)) {
> +               addr = be64_to_cpup(prop);
> +
> +               p = dmi_early_remap(addr, 32);

Please put '32' into a define that explains what it is

> +               if (p == NULL)

I think if (!p) is preferred

> +                       goto out;
> +
> +               memcpy_fromio(buf, p, sizeof(buf));
> +               dmi_early_unmap(p, 32);
> +
> +               if (!dmi_smbios3_present(buf)) {
> +                       dmi_available = true;
> +                       goto out;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +out:
> +       of_node_put(chosen);
> +       return dmi_available;
> +}
> +#else
> +static bool __init dmi_scan_from_dt(void) { return false; }
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) */
> +
>  static void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
>  {
>         char __iomem *p, *q;
> @@ -718,6 +769,13 @@ static void __init dmi_scan_machine(void)
>                         dmi_available = 1;
>                         return;
>                 }
> +       } else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && dmi_scan_from_dt()) {

Can you fold the IS_ENABLED() in dmi_scan_from_dt() please?

> +               /*
[...]

Thanks
/Ilias