linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/5] replaced system_unbound_wq, added WQ_PERCPU to alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251101163121.78400-1-marco.crivellari@suse.com>
Date: Sat,  1 Nov 2025 17:31:10 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
	Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
	Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
	Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] replaced system_unbound_wq, added WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue

Hi,

=== Current situation: problems ===

Let's consider a nohz_full system with isolated CPUs: wq_unbound_cpumask is
set to the housekeeping CPUs, for !WQ_UNBOUND the local CPU is selected.

This leads to different scenarios if a work item is scheduled on an
isolated CPU where "delay" value is 0 or greater then 0:
        schedule_delayed_work(, 0);

This will be handled by __queue_work() that will queue the work item on the
current local (isolated) CPU, while:

        schedule_delayed_work(, 1);

Will move the timer on an housekeeping CPU, and schedule the work there.

Currently if a user enqueue a work item using schedule_delayed_work() the
used wq is "system_wq" (per-cpu wq) while queue_delayed_work() use
WORK_CPU_UNBOUND (used when a cpu is not specified). The same applies to
schedule_work() that is using system_wq and queue_work(), that makes use
again of WORK_CPU_UNBOUND.

This lack of consistency cannot be addressed without refactoring the API.

=== Recent changes to the WQ API ===

The following, address the recent changes in the Workqueue API:

- commit 128ea9f6ccfb ("workqueue: Add system_percpu_wq and system_dfl_wq")
- commit 930c2ea566af ("workqueue: Add new WQ_PERCPU flag")

The old workqueues will be removed in a future release cycle.

=== Introduced Changes by this series ===

1) [P 1]  Replace uses of system_wq and system_unbound_wq

    system_unbound_wq is to be used when locality is not required.

    Because of that, system_unbound_wq has been replaced with
    system_dfl_wq, to make sure it is the default choice when locality
    is not important.

    system_dfl_wq has the same behavior of the old system_unbound_wq.

2) [P 2-5] WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue()

    This change adds a new WQ_PERCPU flag to explicitly request
    alloc_workqueue() to be per-cpu when WQ_UNBOUND has not been specified.


Thanks!


Marco Crivellari (5):
  RDMA/core: RDMA/mlx5: replace use of system_unbound_wq with
    system_dfl_wq
  RDMA/core: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
  hfi1: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
  RDMA/mlx4: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
  IB/rdmavt: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users

 drivers/infiniband/core/cm.c      | 2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/core/device.c  | 4 ++--
 drivers/infiniband/core/ucma.c    | 2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/opfn.c | 4 ++--
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx4/cm.c   | 2 +-
 drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/odp.c  | 4 ++--
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rdmavt/cq.c | 3 ++-
 8 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

-- 
2.51.0