linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Add USB support to SM8750 SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e70cfecc-b2c7-4f09-8d87-6a7e0160769b@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 21:17:42 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com>
To: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@....qualcomm.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
        Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@....qualcomm.com>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: Add USB support to
 SM8750 SoCs



On 11/3/2025 8:40 PM, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
> On 11/2/2025 9:23 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 02, 2025 at 12:43:07AM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote:
>>> On 11/1/2025 11:14 PM, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
>>>> From: Wesley Cheng <wesley.cheng@....qualcomm.com>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8750.dtsi
>> [..]
>>>> +			power-domains = <&gcc GCC_USB30_PRIM_GDSC>;
>>>> +			required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_nom>;
>>>
>>> Probably I am missing something, but which power domain associated to a
>>> rail is scaled to NOM corner here?
>>>
>>
>> That would be the parent of the GCC_USB30_PRIM_GDSC, which should be the
>> CX rail. We currently have a NOM requirement here just in case we're
>> going to operate a SuperSpeed link, and the driver doesn't scale.
>>
> 
> This is a bit concerning. There are other subsystems which share CX
> rail, including GPU. So a hw spec violation on USB may impact these
> subsystems which would be pretty hard to root cause to USB.
> 
> @Krishna, do you plan to fix this with a follow up patch?
> 
>>
>> That said, your question is very much valid, because on SM8750 GCC
>> doesn't specify CX as a power-domain of &gcc, this vote goes into the
>> void.
> 
> So the fix is to just add the VDD_CX power domain to the gcc node and a
> gcc driver change to enable "use_rpm" flag?
> 

Will check with the team internally and post a patch.

Regards,
Krishna,