[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1fd975c-56ef-442b-8617-d63237bf795a@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 16:12:51 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] reset: handle RESET_GPIO better to provide the
fallback
On 15/10/2025 22:59, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> After the discussion[1] (Thanks, Philipp!), here is the updated series.
> Details are in the commit messages. Please let me know what you think.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251015112921.19535-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com
>
You removed RFC and entire rationale. Your earlier commit - 690de2902dca
- is broken. You must not do that. Broken 690de2902dca leads to this
broken patchset, but that is not a correct fix. You need to fix the
source - revert 690de2902dca, because it is obviously wrong. You MUST
ave fallback to reset-gpios, that was the entire concept how this driver
was written.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists