[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ujqee7npggfcqmul6lcm44ilqrhmpcpiaxvdpcjjfawjhf63j@764n7hxk3mfm>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 10:31:52 +0000
From: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
To: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan
<jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko
<mhocko@...e.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, Joonas Lahtinen
<joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Hi Marco,
Usually, imperative form is used for patch titles:
"add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users".
--
Best Regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists