[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF5FJ4T6xVJfHbQdEfyVCxZLXXiZ-s6pNHjRq+GBsJ6imA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:35:18 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Krzysztof Karas <krzysztof.karas@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: WQ_PERCPU added to alloc_workqueue users
Hi Krzysztof,
On Mon, Nov 3, 2025 at 11:32 AM Krzysztof Karas
<krzysztof.karas@...el.com> wrote:
> Usually, imperative form is used for patch titles:
> "add WQ_PERCPU to alloc_workqueue users".
Thanks, I will also fix that one.
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer, Technology & Product
Powered by blists - more mailing lists