[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKmqyKPU8j-D9T-dLNfktf9EVQeA8-pdneOJkscN-0JM0UdEGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 11:40:59 +1000
From: Alistair Francis <alistair23@...il.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: kbusch@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk, sagi@...mberg.me, hare@...e.de,
kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvmet-tcp: Don't free SQ on authentication success
On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 12:03 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 01:51:13PM +1000, alistair23@...il.com wrote:
> > Curently after the host sends a REPLACETLSPSK we free the TLS keys as
> > part of calling nvmet_auth_sq_free() on success. This means when the
> > host sends a follow up REPLACETLSPSK we return CONCAT_MISMATCH as the
> > check for !nvmet_queue_tls_keyid(req->sq) fails.
> >
> > This patch ensures we don't free the TLS key on success as we might need
> > it again in the future.
>
> I initially though we'd now keep it around for the lifetime of the
> queue, but I think we'll still free it from nvmet_execute_auth_send,
> right?
Good point. In theory nvmet_execute_auth_send() can free it, I don't
see that actually happening as `req->sq->dhchap_step` is always
`NVME_AUTH_DHCHAP_MESSAGE_NEGOTIATE` for me.
I'll add another patch to remove the call to nvmet_auth_sq_free() on success.
Alistair
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists