[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c68a2c0-7e30-46da-abf1-759a7dbb7ecf@oss.nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 09:45:04 +0800
From: "Ming Qian(OSS)" <ming.qian@....nxp.com>
To: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>, mchehab@...nel.org,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl
Cc: sebastian.fricke@...labora.com, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
linux-imx@....com, xiahong.bao@....com, eagle.zhou@....com,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] media: docs: dev-decoder: Trigger dynamic source
change for colorspace
Hi Nicolas,
On 8/1/2025 11:23 PM, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Hi Ming,
>
> Le vendredi 18 avril 2025 à 16:54 +0800, ming.qian@....nxp.com a écrit :
>> From: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....nxp.com>
>>
>> If colorspace changes, the client needs to renegotiate the pipeline,
>> otherwise the decoded frame may not be displayed correctly.
>>
>> When a colorspace change in the stream, the decoder sends a
>> V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE event with changes set to
>> V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_COLORSPACE. After client receive this source change
>> event, then client can switch to the correct stream setting. And each
>> frame can be displayed properly.
>
> sorry for the long delay. While reading this, in any case userspace have to read
> the new format. Why can't userspace compare the old and new v4l2_format and
> decide to avoid re-allocation that way ?
>
> There is also backward compatbility issues for driver that was sending
> V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION for colorspace change before. Despite the costly
> re-allocation, userspace only watching for V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION would
> endup not updating the colorspace anymore.
>
> Combining both would be an option, but then V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION means
> any v4l2_format changes, which is awkward. What do you think of leaving to
> userspace the task of comparing the old and new v4l2_format ?
>
> Nicolas
>
Sorry for the delay response (I don't understand why I received this
email several months late.)
I agree that comparing the old and new v4l2_format is feasible. And
there are currently four conditions that can trigger source change.
- coded resolution (OUTPUT width and height),
- visible resolution (selection rectangles),
- the minimum number of buffers needed for decoding,
- bit-depth of the bitstream has been changed.
Therefore, comparing only v4l2_format is insufficient. This is much more
complicated than checking a flag. I'm not sure if existing applications
have already done this.
I also think it's OK for driver to send V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION for
colorspace change, This will only incur additional allocation overhead,
without causing any functional issues.
Therefore, from a driver perspective:
- V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION for format change OK
- V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION for colorspace chagne OK, but
re-allocation cost
- V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE for colorspace change OK
from a client perspective:
- V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION without compareing format OK,
re-allocation
- V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION with comparing format OK,
additional support required
- V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE OK,
additional support required
I believe that adding a V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE flag will help simplify
the process and will not cause too many backward compatibility issues.
Regards,
Ming
>>
>> So add colorspace as a trigger parameter for dynamic resolution change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ming Qian <ming.qian@....nxp.com>
>> ---
>> v2
>> - Add V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_COLORSPACE for colorspace source change event
>>
>> .../userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst | 17 +++++++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
>> b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
>> index ef8e8cf31f90..51d6da3eea4a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/media/v4l/dev-decoder.rst
>> @@ -784,8 +784,8 @@ before the sequence started. Last of the buffers will have
>> the
>> must check if there is any pending event and:
>>
>> * if a ``V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE`` event with ``changes`` set to
>> - ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION`` is pending, the `Dynamic Resolution
>> - Change` sequence needs to be followed,
>> + ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION`` or ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_COLORSPACE`` is
>> pending,
>> + the `Dynamic Resolution Change` sequence needs to be followed,
>>
>> * if a ``V4L2_EVENT_EOS`` event is pending, the `End of Stream` sequence
>> needs
>> to be followed.
>> @@ -932,13 +932,17 @@ reflected by corresponding queries):
>>
>> * the minimum number of buffers needed for decoding,
>>
>> -* bit-depth of the bitstream has been changed.
>> +* bit-depth of the bitstream has been changed,
>> +
>> +* colorspace of the bitstream has been changed.
>>
>> Whenever that happens, the decoder must proceed as follows:
>>
>> 1. After encountering a resolution change in the stream, the decoder sends a
>> ``V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE`` event with ``changes`` set to
>> - ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION``.
>> + ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION``, or a colorspace change in the stream,
>> the
>> + decoder sends a ``V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE`` event with ``changes`` set
>> to
>> + ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_COLORSPACE``.
>>
>> .. important::
>>
>> @@ -946,6 +950,11 @@ Whenever that happens, the decoder must proceed as
>> follows:
>> values applying to the stream after the resolution change, including
>> queue formats, selection rectangles and controls.
>>
>> +.. note::
>> + A ``V4L2_EVENT_SOURCE_CHANGE`` event with ``changes`` set to
>> + ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_RESOLUTION`` will affect the allocation, but
>> + ``V4L2_EVENT_SRC_CH_COLORSPACE`` won't.
>> +
>> 2. The decoder will then process and decode all remaining buffers from
>> before
>> the resolution change point.
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists