[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251103185226.fea151c58ce7077b11b106aa@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2025 18:52:26 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>, Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Matt
Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>, Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@...dia.com>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, "nao.horiguchi@...il.com"
<nao.horiguchi@...il.com>, "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, "vbabka@...e.cz"
<vbabka@...e.cz>, "rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>, "surenb@...gle.com"
<surenb@...gle.com>, "tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>, "mchehab@...nel.org"
<mchehab@...nel.org>, "lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, "alex@...zbot.org"
<alex@...zbot.org>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>, Kirti Wankhede
<kwankhede@...dia.com>, "Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@...dia.com>, Zhi
Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@...dia.com>, Krishnakant Jaju
<kjaju@...dia.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com"
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, "u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com"
<u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: handle poisoning of pfn without struct pages
On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 19:22:09 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
> > Hi Michal, I am trying to replicate what is being done today for non-PFNMAP
> > memory failure in __add_to_kill
> > (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/mm/memory-failure.c#L376).
> > For this series, I am inclined to keep it uniform.
>
> Unless there is a very good reason for this code then I would rather not
> rely on an atomic allocation. This just makes the behavior hard to
> predict
I don't think this was addressed in the v5 series.
Yes please, anything we can do to avoid GFP_ATOMIC makes the kernel
more reliable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists