[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQnXYsPR7zkV_ram@tiehlicka>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 11:37:22 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ankit Agrawal <ankita@...dia.com>, Aniket Agashe <aniketa@...dia.com>,
Vikram Sethi <vsethi@...dia.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Matt Ochs <mochs@...dia.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <skolothumtho@...dia.com>,
"linmiaohe@...wei.com" <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
"nao.horiguchi@...il.com" <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>,
"david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>,
"lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com" <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
"Liam.Howlett@...cle.com" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
"vbabka@...e.cz" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>,
"surenb@...gle.com" <surenb@...gle.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"guohanjun@...wei.com" <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"kevin.tian@...el.com" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"alex@...zbot.org" <alex@...zbot.org>, Neo Jia <cjia@...dia.com>,
Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"Tarun Gupta (SW-GPU)" <targupta@...dia.com>,
Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>, Dheeraj Nigam <dnigam@...dia.com>,
Krishnakant Jaju <kjaju@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
"ira.weiny@...el.com" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
"Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com" <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com" <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mm: handle poisoning of pfn without struct pages
On Mon 03-11-25 18:52:26, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Nov 2025 19:22:09 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi Michal, I am trying to replicate what is being done today for non-PFNMAP
> > > memory failure in __add_to_kill
> > > (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/mm/memory-failure.c#L376).
> > > For this series, I am inclined to keep it uniform.
> >
> > Unless there is a very good reason for this code then I would rather not
> > rely on an atomic allocation. This just makes the behavior hard to
> > predict
>
> I don't think this was addressed in the v5 series.
>
> Yes please, anything we can do to avoid GFP_ATOMIC makes the kernel
> more reliable.
This could be done on top of the series because as such this is not a
blocker but it would be really great if we can stop copying a bad code
and rather get rid of it also in other poisoning code.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists