lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQqvEsdoj0El2Dq4@archie.me>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 08:57:38 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Documentation <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Integrity <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: tpm: tpm-security: Demote "Null Primary
 Key Certification in Userspace" section

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 09:55:08AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 20:13 +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> > The last section heading in TPM security docs is formatted as title
> > heading instead. As such, it shows up as TPM toctree entry. Demote it
> > to section heading as appropriate.
> 
> It's supposed to be a separate heading.  It's explaining how to certify
> your booted kernel rather than describing TPM security within the
> kernel.

Should I keep the whole section as-is or should I move it to separate docs?

Thanks. 

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ